Name: Steven P. Hollman
Current Position: Of Counsel, Sheppard, Mullen, Richter & Hampton, LLP
DC Bar Office Sought: Board of Governors
Have you had any past involvement with the AAJLJ?
Although I have not been a member of AAJLJ, I was a founding member of the Capital Legal Council of B’nai B’rith and have been active as a volunteer for the Law Committee of the Anti-Defamation League. For many years, I served on the Board of the Washington Hebrew Congregation and was its Brotherhood President. I am proud of my Jewish heritage and am an active member of the Jewish community of greater Washington.
Why are you seeking a leadership position in the DC Bar?
We are at a moment of existential crisis confronting our legal system, the rule of law, and access to justice. I have devoted a substantial part of my 40+ year career at Sheppard Mullin and Hogan & Hartson/Hogan Lovells to these principles and the institutions that support them. I believe the Bar should stand strongly for these institutions and values. That is why I am a Board candidate.
What has been your past involvement with voluntary bar associations, including leadership positions in any Bar or legal organization.
Past Co-Chair, Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs
Past President, Washington Council of Lawyers
Past President, Court of Federal Claims Bar Association
Past Board Member, Federal Bar Association, Maryland Chapter
Past Board Member, ACLU of Maryland
Fellow, American Bar Foundation
What do you see as the major issues facing the DC Bar?
The attack on the rule of law, access to justice and voting rights and on institutions that defend these values is the single most important issue confronting the D.C. Bar. I am mindful of the strictures imposed bv the referenda and the institutional constraints necessarily arising from the Bar’s status as a mandatory bar organization, but I believe that protecting the independence of the judiciary, voluntary bar associations and private law firms, and securing access to justice and voting rights, are values we all must share, and they are non-partisan and should be non-political.
Given that the DC Bar is a mandatory bar, what role do you think the DC Bar is able to play in protecting the rule of law?
Without question. If elected, I plan to confer with Bar leadership, the ABA, other mandatory bar associations around the country that are speaking out, the private bar community, voluntary bar associations and former government lawyers to develop an action plan to speak out against abuses that seek to weaken and compromise the independence of institutions that are the bulwark against assaults on the rule of law, recognizing that when we rise as a community devoted to access to justice and the rule of law, our unified voices will resonate.
Please tell us about any commitment to issues/activities that might have a significant impact on the Jewish community?
A sizeable portion of my legal career has been devoted to efforts to make a difference rather than just making a living. As a law firm partner, I have pursued pro bono work in a broad range of civil rights and constitutional matters involving claims under the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments, the Voting Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VI, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act.
During my 33 years at Hogan & Hartson and its successor, Hogan Lovells, and in my subsequent 9 years at Sheppard, I have demonstrated my dedication to the development and delivery of legal services through the pro bono programs of those firms and my ability to marshal the resources of the private bar to address systemic wrong.
My dedication is reflected in both the depth of my litigation work and my sustained commitment to civic and community service. I repeatedly have stepped into complex, high-stakes pro bono representations requiring sophisticated trial and appellate advocacy—often in areas where clients of limited means have faced overwhelming power imbalances.
My pro bono docket has demonstrated a consistent focus on giving voice to people and communities without political power and extending legal protections to communities facing significant historic and structural disadvantages, including people with disabilities, communities of color, victims of hate crimes, and children at risk. My cases also have addressed civil rights, environmental justice, and access to essential public services.
In my practice, I was one of the attorneys who provided pro bono representation to the Shaare Tefila Congregation of Silver Spring before the Supreme Court after the synagogue was desecrated in an episode of anti-Semitic hate violence. In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court held that a section of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 which prohibits racial discrimination applies to any people subjected to intentional discrimination because of "their ancestry or ethnic characteristics," expanding the range of federal remedies available to victims of hate violence. See Shaare Tefila Congregation v. Cobb, 481 U.S. 615 (1987).
I worked with the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs and the National Institute Against Prejudice and Violence to oversee the preparation of an update to a published national survey of federal and state remedies available to victims of hate violence: Striking Back at Bigotry: Remedies Under Federal and State Law for Violence Motivated by Racial, Religious, and Ethnic Prejudice (1986).
I deeply appreciate the interest of the AAJLJ in these issues. I would be grateful for the votes of your members and your community in the DC Bar election for Board of Governors.